Current Search:  Reading readiness (x)

View All Items

  • CSV Spreadsheet
(1 - 2 of 2)
effect of computer-assisted instruction on the reading skills of emergent readers
Title
The effect of computer-assisted instruction on the reading skills of emergent readers.
Creator
Barnett, Louise B., Florida Atlantic University, Crawley, Sharon J.
Abstract/Description
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on the reading skills of emergent readers in kindergarten classes at select Reading First schools in the School District of Palm Beach County, Florida. The reading software analyzed was Destination Reading (Riverdeep, 2001), used during the 2004-2005 school year. Comparisons were made between users of the program and nonusers. Comparisons were also made between English language learners who used or did...
Show moreThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on the reading skills of emergent readers in kindergarten classes at select Reading First schools in the School District of Palm Beach County, Florida. The reading software analyzed was Destination Reading (Riverdeep, 2001), used during the 2004-2005 school year. Comparisons were made between users of the program and nonusers. Comparisons were also made between English language learners who used or did not use the program, as well as Exceptional Education students who used or did not use it. Another factor analyzed was how teacher attitude toward the computer affected student reading achievement. This was established by survey responses. The measures used to compare treatment and non-treatment schools were the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS), which tested letter naming ability, initial sound identification, phoneme segmentation ability, and nonsense word decoding. The Word Recognition and Reading Running Record assessments from the School District of Palm Beach County Reading and Writing Assessment System Grades K-1 protocol booklet tested identification of 25 sight words and ability to read continuous text. Students using Destination Reading (Riverdeep, 2001) did not benefit significantly from use of the program compared to nonusers. Only on the letter-naming measure was there a significant advantage for all students in the sample and the English language learner group. The CAI group scored significantly lower on the initial sound fluency measure. Word Recognition and Reading Running Record assessments showed no significant results. ESE students showed no significant advantage in having had supplemental computer-assisted instruction on any measures. Factorial ANOVAs were used to compare DIBELS scores for effectiveness of the treatment, pre- and posttest comparisons, and interaction of treatment with test scores for the CAI compared with the nonuser group. T distributions were used to analyze data from the Reading Running Record and Word Recognition assessments. There were no significant differences between the CAI and comparison schools on these two measures. Teacher attitude toward computers did not affect students' acquisition of reading skills, as survey responses were in the positive range for all participants.
Show less
Date Issued
2006
PURL
http://purl.flvc.org/fcla/dt/12189
Subject Headings
Reading (Kindergarten)--Computer-assisted instruction, Reading readiness, Media programs (Education), Internet in education
Format
Document (PDF)
Gender and socioeconomic status as predictors of reading gain scores on the Stanford Achievement Test for fifth grade students who participated in computer-assisted instruction
Title
Gender and socioeconomic status as predictors of reading gain scores on the Stanford Achievement Test for fifth grade students who participated in computer-assisted instruction.
Creator
Rose, Garie H., Florida Atlantic University, Jurenas, Albert C.
Abstract/Description
This study investigated Stanford Achievement Test (Eighth Edition) reading scores in vocabulary, comprehension, and total reading achievement. Scores were obtained from gender and socioeconomic levels (SES) of regular education fifth grade students following the use of computer assisted instruction (CAI) using Jostens Learning Corporation software. Factorial analyses of variance were performed to test the interaction between high and low socioeconomic levels (SES) of regular education...
Show moreThis study investigated Stanford Achievement Test (Eighth Edition) reading scores in vocabulary, comprehension, and total reading achievement. Scores were obtained from gender and socioeconomic levels (SES) of regular education fifth grade students following the use of computer assisted instruction (CAI) using Jostens Learning Corporation software. Factorial analyses of variance were performed to test the interaction between high and low socioeconomic levels (SES) of regular education students, and gender on the Stanford Achievement Scores (Eighth Edition) in the areas of vocabulary, comprehension, and total reading achievement. All participants used computer assisted instruction for three years as a supplement to basal reading instruction. The sample consisted of 590 elementary students (312 females and 278 males) in grade 5. Socioeconomic levels were determined by whether or not the students received free or reduced price lunch (139 low SES students and 451 high SES students). All participants attended the same school for three years and had three consecutive years of scores in vocabulary, comprehension, and total reading achievement on the SAT. Gain scores were obtained by subtracting the 1994 scores from the 1996 scores in vocabulary, comprehension, and total reading achievement. Mean gain scores were compared between groups using factorial analysis of variance, with SES and gender as the factors. Analyses revealed that there was not a significant (p < .05) difference between high and low SES students in comprehension or total reading achievement. There was a significant $(p < .05)$ difference between high and low SES students in vocabulary gain scores, but the difference was too small to be of practical significance. Analyses revealed that there was not a significant (p < .05) difference between males and females and scores in vocabulary, comprehension, or total reading achievement. There was a significant interaction (p < .05) between gender and SES in vocabulary, comprehension, and total reading achievement scores. Results of this study clearly indicated that there were more gains for certain groups of students. Recommendations suggest that future research includes close examination of low SES male students and their unique learning styles. Characteristics, their interactions with the computer and software design should also be studied.
Show less
Date Issued
1997
PURL
http://purl.flvc.org/fcla/dt/12542
Subject Headings
Educational tests and measurements, Educational tests and measurements--Sex differences, Educational tests and measurements--Social aspects, Reading readiness--Testing
Format
Document (PDF)