You are here
Assessment success today or learning success tomorrow? How a longitudinal perspective can help standards-based accountability systems eliminate the persistent gap between nominal and actual achievement for high school graduates
- Date Issued:
- 2005
- Summary:
- Current standards-based accountability systems, exemplified by No Child Left Behind (NCLB), generally rely on successive year comparisons to gauge educational progress and place special emphasis on achievement in elementary school, but include no mechanisms to monitor the degree to which early improvements noted by increases in these successive year comparisons demonstrate genuine improvements in curricular and instructional practice that lead to higher levels of achievement in later grades. The absence of a longitudinal perspective within these standards-based accountability systems means that critical educational decisions such as the continuation or abandonment of practices or programs may be based on incomplete depictions of student achievement. The present study was designed to test and present an alternate method of data analysis that can be used to complement (not replace) the analysis that is typical of current accountability systems, without any additional testing or resources. The study utilized extant student achievement data for reading and math for more than 9,000 students from a large ethnically and economically diverse school district, and compared the results of data analyses typical of current standards-based accountability systems with those using the proposed longitudinal analyses. While the depictions of student achievement presented by the different methods were rather similar for math, they were vastly different for reading, which suggests that the addition of the proposed longitudinal analysis has the potential to enhance current systems such that they provide more complete depictions of student achievement.
Title: | Assessment success today or learning success tomorrow? How a longitudinal perspective can help standards-based accountability systems eliminate the persistent gap between nominal and actual achievement for high school graduates. |
117 views
25 downloads |
---|---|---|
Name(s): |
Dolan, Megan F. Florida Atlantic University, Degree grantor Ashworth, Sara, Thesis advisor |
|
Type of Resource: | text | |
Genre: | Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation | |
Issuance: | monographic | |
Date Issued: | 2005 | |
Publisher: | Florida Atlantic University | |
Place of Publication: | Boca Raton, Fla. | |
Physical Form: | application/pdf | |
Extent: | 110 p. | |
Language(s): | English | |
Summary: | Current standards-based accountability systems, exemplified by No Child Left Behind (NCLB), generally rely on successive year comparisons to gauge educational progress and place special emphasis on achievement in elementary school, but include no mechanisms to monitor the degree to which early improvements noted by increases in these successive year comparisons demonstrate genuine improvements in curricular and instructional practice that lead to higher levels of achievement in later grades. The absence of a longitudinal perspective within these standards-based accountability systems means that critical educational decisions such as the continuation or abandonment of practices or programs may be based on incomplete depictions of student achievement. The present study was designed to test and present an alternate method of data analysis that can be used to complement (not replace) the analysis that is typical of current accountability systems, without any additional testing or resources. The study utilized extant student achievement data for reading and math for more than 9,000 students from a large ethnically and economically diverse school district, and compared the results of data analyses typical of current standards-based accountability systems with those using the proposed longitudinal analyses. While the depictions of student achievement presented by the different methods were rather similar for math, they were vastly different for reading, which suggests that the addition of the proposed longitudinal analysis has the potential to enhance current systems such that they provide more complete depictions of student achievement. | |
Identifier: | 9780496971572 (isbn), 12134 (digitool), FADT12134 (IID), fau:9042 (fedora) | |
Collection: | FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection | |
Note(s): |
College of Education Thesis (Ed.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2005. |
|
Subject(s): |
Academic achievement--Measurement Educational productivity--Measurement Academic achievement--Longitudinal studies Education, Higher--United States--Longitudinal studies Educational equalization--United States--Longitudinal studies |
|
Held by: | Florida Atlantic University Libraries | |
Persistent Link to This Record: | http://purl.flvc.org/fcla/dt/12134 | |
Sublocation: | Digital Library | |
Use and Reproduction: | Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder. | |
Use and Reproduction: | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
Host Institution: | FAU | |
Is Part of Series: | Florida Atlantic University Digital Library Collections. |