You are here
Operational and environmental comparisons between left-turn bypass, diverging flow and displaced left-turn intersection designs
- Date Issued:
- 2011
- Summary:
- The rapidly and significantly growth of the population in the United States has caused expansion of the urban areas to accommodate more residential facilities.. Thus, the demand for more efficient intersection designs is a high priority, as wasted fuel and travel time increases each year. A new method to solve the congestion issue is the creation of unconventional arterial intersection designs (UAID). The objective of this study is to compare the operational and environmental performance of three UAIDs called Left-turn Bypass, Diverging Flow, and Displaced Left-turn intersections. This study will evaluate the UAIDs in the isolated manner and then compare the intersections in a network using an existing corridor in the state of Florida. The microscopic simulation platform VISSIM v. 5.10 will be used to test different scenarios. The results indicated that the Displaced Left-turn consistently reports better results for average delay of less than 20 seconds per vehicle.
Title: | Operational and environmental comparisons between left-turn bypass, diverging flow and displaced left-turn intersection designs. |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|---|
Name(s): |
Olarte, Claudia College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering |
|
Type of Resource: | text | |
Genre: | Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation | |
Date Issued: | 2011 | |
Publisher: | Florida Atlantic University | |
Physical Form: | electronic | |
Extent: | xi, 131 p. : ill. (some col.) | |
Language(s): | English | |
Summary: | The rapidly and significantly growth of the population in the United States has caused expansion of the urban areas to accommodate more residential facilities.. Thus, the demand for more efficient intersection designs is a high priority, as wasted fuel and travel time increases each year. A new method to solve the congestion issue is the creation of unconventional arterial intersection designs (UAID). The objective of this study is to compare the operational and environmental performance of three UAIDs called Left-turn Bypass, Diverging Flow, and Displaced Left-turn intersections. This study will evaluate the UAIDs in the isolated manner and then compare the intersections in a network using an existing corridor in the state of Florida. The microscopic simulation platform VISSIM v. 5.10 will be used to test different scenarios. The results indicated that the Displaced Left-turn consistently reports better results for average delay of less than 20 seconds per vehicle. | |
Identifier: | 738440805 (oclc), 3172428 (digitool), FADT3172428 (IID), fau:3656 (fedora) | |
Note(s): |
by Claudia Olarte. Thesis (M.S.C.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2011. Includes bibliography. Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2011. Mode of access: World Wide Web. |
|
Subject(s): |
Traffic engineering Streets -- Design Traffic signs and signals Roads -- United States -- Interchanges and intersections |
|
Persistent Link to This Record: | http://purl.flvc.org/FAU/3172428 | |
Use and Reproduction: | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
Host Institution: | FAU |