You are here

FAU Collections » FAU Research Repository » FAU Theses and Dissertations

System justification requires psychological proximity

Download pdf | Full Screen View

Date Issued:
2008
Summary:
System justification theorists have proposed that people will defend one's circumstances, even if they inflict psychological and material costs. This tendency has been found to extend even to outcomes that have not yet been decided, but are perceived as being likely; however, this research has only examined outcomes that will be decided on in the near future. According to Construal Level Theory (CLT), distant future events are represented primarily according to their essential features, while thoughts about temporally near events are more concrete and contextual. We hypothesized that system justification results from the motivational impact of low-level thinking, and so would be expected to occur for near-future, but not distant-future, outcomes. Consistent with our hypothesis, our Main Study found evidence of system justification only when outcomes were to be decided in the near future. Distant future outcomes, in contrast, were viewed as being more undesirable as they became increasingly likely.
Title: System justification requires psychological proximity.
221 views
137 downloads
Name(s): Martens, Nicholas J.
Charles E. Schmidt College of Science
Department of Psychology
Type of Resource: text
Genre: Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation
Date Issued: 2008
Publisher: Florida Atlantic University
Physical Form: electronic
Extent: vi, 65 p. : ill.
Language(s): English
Summary: System justification theorists have proposed that people will defend one's circumstances, even if they inflict psychological and material costs. This tendency has been found to extend even to outcomes that have not yet been decided, but are perceived as being likely; however, this research has only examined outcomes that will be decided on in the near future. According to Construal Level Theory (CLT), distant future events are represented primarily according to their essential features, while thoughts about temporally near events are more concrete and contextual. We hypothesized that system justification results from the motivational impact of low-level thinking, and so would be expected to occur for near-future, but not distant-future, outcomes. Consistent with our hypothesis, our Main Study found evidence of system justification only when outcomes were to be decided in the near future. Distant future outcomes, in contrast, were viewed as being more undesirable as they became increasingly likely.
Identifier: 317858081 (oclc), 186299 (digitool), FADT186299 (IID), fau:2866 (fedora)
Note(s): by Nicholas J. Martens.
Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2008.
Includes bibliography.
Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2008. Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Subject(s): Motivation (Psychology)
Social service -- Psychological aspects
Resilience (Personality trait)
Affect (Psychology) -- Study and teaching
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/FAU/186299
Use and Reproduction: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Host Institution: FAU