You are here
BARUCH PLAN
- Date Issued:
- 1984
- Summary:
- This thesis takes the reader from the detonation of the first atomic bomb to the failure to reach agreement at the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission meeting during the fall of 1946. Within these months was lost perhaps the last opportunity to eliminate the nuclear threat to the world, and gone a chance to avert an international arms race. The subject of responsibility for failure to reach agreement on the American proposal, presented by Bernard M. Baruch at the first meeting in 1946, is here addressed. When negotiations were still possible, Baruch remained inflexible because of reliance upon a winning weapon. The Russian delegate, Andrei A. Gromyko, was unshaken in clinging to national security, and optimistic about the Soviet development of its own bomb. In no way was agreement possible. Both sides took positions which ensured failure.
Title: | THE BARUCH PLAN. |
139 views
25 downloads |
---|---|---|
Name(s): |
BYSTOCK, TED. Florida Atlantic University, Degree grantor O'Sullivan, John, Thesis advisor |
|
Type of Resource: | text | |
Genre: | Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation | |
Date Issued: | 1984 | |
Publisher: | Florida Atlantic University | |
Place of Publication: | Boca Raton, Fla. | |
Physical Form: | application/pdf | |
Extent: | 104 p. | |
Language(s): | English | |
Summary: | This thesis takes the reader from the detonation of the first atomic bomb to the failure to reach agreement at the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission meeting during the fall of 1946. Within these months was lost perhaps the last opportunity to eliminate the nuclear threat to the world, and gone a chance to avert an international arms race. The subject of responsibility for failure to reach agreement on the American proposal, presented by Bernard M. Baruch at the first meeting in 1946, is here addressed. When negotiations were still possible, Baruch remained inflexible because of reliance upon a winning weapon. The Russian delegate, Andrei A. Gromyko, was unshaken in clinging to national security, and optimistic about the Soviet development of its own bomb. In no way was agreement possible. Both sides took positions which ensured failure. | |
Identifier: | 14222 (digitool), FADT14222 (IID), fau:11032 (fedora) | |
Collection: | FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection | |
Note(s): |
Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 1984. Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters |
|
Subject(s): |
Baruch, Bernard M.--(Bernard Mannes),--1870-1965 Nuclear warfare Nuclear arms control |
|
Held by: | Florida Atlantic University Libraries | |
Persistent Link to This Record: | http://purl.flvc.org/fcla/dt/14222 | |
Sublocation: | Digital Library | |
Use and Reproduction: | Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder. | |
Use and Reproduction: | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
Host Institution: | FAU | |
Is Part of Series: | Florida Atlantic University Digital Library Collections. |