You are here

Interaction between surface-based and edge-based motion mechanisms in the perception of apparent motion

Download pdf | Full Screen View

Date Issued:
2006
Summary:
The motion of an object may be perceived based on a change in location of either its surface or edges. By isolating the luminance changes produced by a moving object from the physical displacement of its surface and edges, it was found that a static object appears to move when the luminance changes are restricted to a narrow area adjacent to it. Therefore, changes in the luminance contrast of edges are sufficient for the perception of object motion. However, the existence of different motion signals based on luminance changes of edges and surfaces was confirmed by the occurrence of different motion percepts for the same stimulus configuration. As the width of the region which changed in luminance was increased, edge-based motion percepts were replaced by a surface-based motion percept. This study was primarily concerned with the interaction between the mechanisms that signal edge-based motion and surface-based motion. It was found that surface-based motion mechanisms inhibit edge-based motion mechanisms, even when the different motion patterns were in the same direction. Modulating the effects of this inhibition was facilitation between edge-based motion mechanisms when two sliding-edge motions were possible in the same direction. Less facilitation, and possibly inhibition, occurred when the sliding-edge motions were in the opposite compared with the same direction. Finally, there was even greater inhibition from surface-based motion mechanisms ado edge-based motion mechanisms when the different motion patterns were specified in the opposite compared with the same direction. It is concluded that much of the observed inhibition results from high-level perceptual processes that distinguish between whether particular luminance changes are caused by the disappearance and reappearance of one object or by the local movement of multiple objects. Assuming that jumping-object motion is perceived naturally when there is an interruption in the visual processing of a moving object, such as with blinking, the nature of the inhibition would serve to, reduce the inappropriate perception of motion for ether objects adjacent to the previously and newly occupied locations of the moving object.
Title: Interaction between surface-based and edge-based motion mechanisms in the perception of apparent motion.
77 views
21 downloads
Name(s): Nichols, David F.
Florida Atlantic University, Degree Grantor
Charles E. Schmidt College of Science
Department of Psychology
Type of Resource: text
Genre: Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation
Issuance: monographic
Date Issued: 2006
Publisher: Florida Atlantic University
Place of Publication: Boca Raton, Fla.
Physical Form: application/pdf
Extent: 97 p.
Language(s): English
Summary: The motion of an object may be perceived based on a change in location of either its surface or edges. By isolating the luminance changes produced by a moving object from the physical displacement of its surface and edges, it was found that a static object appears to move when the luminance changes are restricted to a narrow area adjacent to it. Therefore, changes in the luminance contrast of edges are sufficient for the perception of object motion. However, the existence of different motion signals based on luminance changes of edges and surfaces was confirmed by the occurrence of different motion percepts for the same stimulus configuration. As the width of the region which changed in luminance was increased, edge-based motion percepts were replaced by a surface-based motion percept. This study was primarily concerned with the interaction between the mechanisms that signal edge-based motion and surface-based motion. It was found that surface-based motion mechanisms inhibit edge-based motion mechanisms, even when the different motion patterns were in the same direction. Modulating the effects of this inhibition was facilitation between edge-based motion mechanisms when two sliding-edge motions were possible in the same direction. Less facilitation, and possibly inhibition, occurred when the sliding-edge motions were in the opposite compared with the same direction. Finally, there was even greater inhibition from surface-based motion mechanisms ado edge-based motion mechanisms when the different motion patterns were specified in the opposite compared with the same direction. It is concluded that much of the observed inhibition results from high-level perceptual processes that distinguish between whether particular luminance changes are caused by the disappearance and reappearance of one object or by the local movement of multiple objects. Assuming that jumping-object motion is perceived naturally when there is an interruption in the visual processing of a moving object, such as with blinking, the nature of the inhibition would serve to, reduce the inappropriate perception of motion for ether objects adjacent to the previously and newly occupied locations of the moving object.
Identifier: 9780542837593 (isbn), 12235 (digitool), FADT12235 (IID), fau:9142 (fedora)
Collection: FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
Note(s): Adviser: Howard S. Hock.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2006.
Subject(s): Psychology, Experimental
Psychology, Cognitive
Held by: Florida Atlantic University Libraries
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/fcla/dt/12235
Sublocation: Digital Library
Use and Reproduction: Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
Use and Reproduction: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Host Institution: FAU
Is Part of Series: Florida Atlantic University Digital Library Collections.